<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FreeBSD servers uptime Poll</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.freebsdnews.net/2008/07/21/freebsd-servers-uptime-poll/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.freebsdnews.net/2008/07/21/freebsd-servers-uptime-poll/</link>
	<description>FreeBSD is a free, open-source and UNIX-like operating system. Though relatively unknown, it’s a powerful “work-horse”, capable of coping with massive work-loads whilest remaining fast, ultra-stable and rock-solid. Blogging about FreeBSD and systems based on this most versatile, safe and secure OS, I want to generate more interest in FreeBSD and its dependants.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 07:17:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Hussain Ali</title>
		<link>http://www.freebsdnews.net/2008/07/21/freebsd-servers-uptime-poll/#comment-1102</link>
		<dc:creator>Hussain Ali</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 20:21:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freebsdnews.net/?p=549#comment-1102</guid>
		<description>Several running 4.7, heres the uptime of one:

backup01# uptime
 4:14PM  up 1576 days,  1:24, 1 user, load averages: 1.31, 1.02, 1.04
backup01# uname -r
4.7-RELEASE-p25
backup01# ls -al /var/run/dmesg.boot
-rw-r--r--  1 root  wheel  5064 Apr  8  2004 /var/run/dmesg.boot
backup01# grep CPU /var/run/dmesg.boot
CPU: Pentium III/Pentium III Xeon/Celeron (1125.77-MHz 686-class CPU)
SMP: AP CPU #1 Launched!


To be replaced this year with 7.1 :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Several running 4.7, heres the uptime of one:</p>
<p>backup01# uptime<br />
 4:14PM  up 1576 days,  1:24, 1 user, load averages: 1.31, 1.02, 1.04<br />
backup01# uname -r<br />
4.7-RELEASE-p25<br />
backup01# ls -al /var/run/dmesg.boot<br />
-rw-r&#8211;r&#8211;  1 root  wheel  5064 Apr  8  2004 /var/run/dmesg.boot<br />
backup01# grep CPU /var/run/dmesg.boot<br />
CPU: Pentium III/Pentium III Xeon/Celeron (1125.77-MHz 686-class CPU)<br />
SMP: AP CPU #1 Launched!</p>
<p>To be replaced this year with 7.1 :(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karl Fischer</title>
		<link>http://www.freebsdnews.net/2008/07/21/freebsd-servers-uptime-poll/#comment-1071</link>
		<dc:creator>Karl Fischer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 10:40:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freebsdnews.net/?p=549#comment-1071</guid>
		<description>Ahh ... makes me all warm inside.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahh &#8230; makes me all warm inside.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher Hylarides</title>
		<link>http://www.freebsdnews.net/2008/07/21/freebsd-servers-uptime-poll/#comment-1063</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Hylarides</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 13:28:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freebsdnews.net/?p=549#comment-1063</guid>
		<description>At a company I used to work at, we had a site that had a rack of freebsd 4.4 servers (that were only decommissioned late last year!) .  They had an uptime of well over 1400 days.  The only that didn't had a hardware failure (the infamous dell 1650 ATI chip problem).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At a company I used to work at, we had a site that had a rack of freebsd 4.4 servers (that were only decommissioned late last year!) .  They had an uptime of well over 1400 days.  The only that didn&#8217;t had a hardware failure (the infamous dell 1650 ATI chip problem).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://www.freebsdnews.net/2008/07/21/freebsd-servers-uptime-poll/#comment-1062</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 13:11:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freebsdnews.net/?p=549#comment-1062</guid>
		<description>several:

1:34PM  up 1839 days,  6:56, 1 user, load averages: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00

3:07PM  up 1180 days,  2:14, 1 user, load averages: 0.04, 0.03, 0.00

:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>several:</p>
<p>1:34PM  up 1839 days,  6:56, 1 user, load averages: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00</p>
<p>3:07PM  up 1180 days,  2:14, 1 user, load averages: 0.04, 0.03, 0.00</p>
<p>:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kace</title>
		<link>http://www.freebsdnews.net/2008/07/21/freebsd-servers-uptime-poll/#comment-1061</link>
		<dc:creator>kace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 13:03:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freebsdnews.net/?p=549#comment-1061</guid>
		<description>I hesitate to admit this, because what it usually really means is that you have a system in dire need of security patches. :/  But, there's this:

$ uptime
 8:37AM  up 1605 days, 18:30, 1 user, load averages: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
$ ls -l /var/run/dmesg.boot 
-rw-r--r--  1 root  wheel  8781 Feb 27  2004 /var/run/dmesg.boot</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hesitate to admit this, because what it usually really means is that you have a system in dire need of security patches. :/  But, there&#8217;s this:</p>
<p>$ uptime<br />
 8:37AM  up 1605 days, 18:30, 1 user, load averages: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00<br />
$ ls -l /var/run/dmesg.boot<br />
-rw-r&#8211;r&#8211;  1 root  wheel  8781 Feb 27  2004 /var/run/dmesg.boot</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.436 seconds -->
