FreeBSD 9.0 feature requests

One of the sessions at EuroBSDCon 2009 DevSummit last week was FreeBSD 9.0 and what the devs would like to see included.

I took pictures of the whiteboard.  What do you think of the request and what else would you want to see included (post your comments)?

IMG_2905

Click image to magnify

IMG_2907

Click image to magnify

IMG_2908

About Gerard

Gerard is a keen user of open source operating systems and software. On this blog he shares FreeBSD news and links that he comes across.
This entry was posted in FreeBSD. Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to FreeBSD 9.0 feature requests

  1. fdsll says:

    Who can upload presentation, video, pdf, all materials from conference ?

  2. eg says:

    Robert Watson wrote in freebsd-advocacy list:

    “Fairly soon, we should have slides, papers, and audio recordings of many of
    the sessions on the UKUUG web site…”

    http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-advocacy/2009-September/003855.html

  3. Pedro says:

    Missing Item: Kernel support for Apple’s Grand Central Dispatch

    UJust my $0.02, of course.

  4. Ron says:

    Replace rc.d/inet with launchd
    full address space layout randomization
    full data execution protection/openbsd w^x
    native intel GMA 500 drivers

  5. sakis says:

    In addition to the other requests:

    - Sysinstall able to install on zfs and other filesystems
    - Sysinstall to be able to configure basic firewall rules and secure levels preconfigured options
    - Clang to be the default instead of gcc
    - Sensors framework support similar to Linux lm-sensors
    - Full support for HP Proliant server and their support pack utilities
    - Jails framework improvements on resource limits and ezjail re-written in C and intergration with the OS
    - Introduce real clustering file system

  6. grey says:

    http://blogs.sun.com/darren/entry/introducing_zfs_crypto_in_oracle

    Keeping ZFS up to date with upstream… last year this time they added deduplication, this past week encryption. It would be great to take advantage of that; but currently FreeBSD ports trees seem to be kept in much closer sync with upstream maintainers than ZFS.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>