Happy 2009 – a new year & a new theme

Welcome to 2009! I’m wishing all my readers a happy and prosperous 2009, at home and at work.

Hopefully, we’ll see the birth of FreeBSD 8.0 Stable sometime this year, newer versions of FreeBSD-based operating systems and further progress of free / open source software in general.

With the start of the new year I’ve also decided to change the site’s theme to a more professional looking one. Let me know what you think of it.

Bordeaux 1.6 for FreeBSD and PC-BSD Released

bordeaux group logoSteven Edwards of the Bordeaux Technology Group released Bordeaux 1.6 for FreeBSD and PC-BSD today.

Bordeaux 1.6 comes with added support for Google’s Chrome Web Browser, Google Earth, Google Picasa. Additionally, Cellar support has improved; you can now delete and install into an existing Cellar. There has also been many small bug fixes and tweaks on the backend to improve the speed and reliability of all the supported applications.

A .sh build available for FreeBSD users and a .pbi build for PC-BSD users. Everyone who purchased the beta is entitled to a free upgrade and we will start your six months of support with this final 1.6 build. We would also at this time like to thank all the customers who purchased the 1.6 beta build. “Thanks for the support”

The cost of Bordeaux 1.6 is $20.00. Anyone who has purchased Bordeaux in the past six months is entitled to a free upgrade. Bordeaux comes with six months of upgrades and support and of course a 30-day money back guarantee.

The Bordeaux Technology Group is a software services and development company specializing in Windows compatibility software. Users of BSD systems from time to time find themselves in the need to run specialized Windows software. The Bordeaux suite enables access to these programs and data in a seamless and low cost manner without requiring licensing of Microsoft Technology. The Bordeaux Group also provides migration services and support for alternative operating systems specializing in Windows compatibility.

Links: Bordeaugroup.com | buy Bordeaux 

Thanks to Tom Wickline (wine-reviews.net) for emailing this story.

Support the FreeBSD Foundation (& FreeBSD)

FreeBSD Foundation is a non-profit organisation supporting the FreeBSD Project by part-funding some BSD conferences, by giving traveling grants to FreeBSD developers so they can go to conferences, by paying some developers etc etc.

The Foundation is some $33.000 off their 2008 goal ($300,000), so if you want to show your appreciation of the work the Foundation and the Project have done so far, why not donate in order to support their work and help fund future progress?

Tomorrow, 31/12 is the last day you can do this in 2008…

Evoke (formerly D*mnSmallBSD)

It’s been quiet around D*mnSmallBSD the last 12 months. Progress is slow as it’s only a small project and there has been a leadership change.

The project has moved their website to Google Code and changed it’s name to Evoke on request of the D*mn Small Linux team who said there was confusion amongst their users who thought the 2 projects were related.

There were some reasons for choosing for Evoke:

  • It has a ‘blank’ connotation. D*mnSmallBSD has a connotation of small size over everything, or worse, a connotation that we are exactly the same as D*mnSmallLinux, except for BSD.
  • It deliberately lacks the ‘BSD’ postfix. This is due to the fact that from a technical standpoint, we are not bound to a BSD kernel. Given infinite resources we could be using NT as our primary kernel, along with Linux, FreeBSD, and Darwin…
  • It also lacks a ‘OS’ postfix, common to a lot of systems. This is done purely for aesthetics.
  • There is a low number of syllables, making it easy to remember.
  • It’s different.

Evoke is a small (50mb or less) live FreeBSD environment geared toward developers and system administrators, but we also include applications that the average user may find handy.

Our goal is to be able to run on older hardware, as well as modern machines, while providing a responsive system. We support both SMP and uniprocessor machines.

Dylan is putting a quite some thought in how to build and develop Evoke. For instance:

sysconfig

Conventionally, most UNIX’s store their configuration information in the /etc directory on the root filesystem. This has numerous downsides:

  • The system configuration is accessed like a conventional root filesystem, meaning that if the disk drive fails, or the controller/bridge, the system configuration is unusable.
  • There is little to no redundancy, and rarely will you be able to recover from obvious consistency problems. As well, there’s no way of rolling back to a previous version.
  • The system configuration info is almost always required to exist on the same filesystem as the boot system. This means that you have to implement hacks such as unionfs to have a running system from a read-only root, for files that are normally modified, such as /etc/resolv.conf, or /etc/mtab on SYSV systems.

userconfig

Originally, sysconfig was going to extract everything, and to have more then one user, you would have more then one sysconfig partition. However, I realized that this was adding unnecessary inflexibility, and user’s may wish to have multiple ‘users’, which they can log in as at will.

What do you think of these changes? Should this be considered by the FreeBSD devs, or should sysconfig be left as it is? Please leave your feedback below in the comments.

Hopefully I’ll have some more info on the project and it’s progress over the next few days.

Most reliable hosting companies – November 2008

Guess what operating system the number 1 on Netcraft’s most reliable hosting companies (November 2008) runs. No, guess what operating system the number 1 and 2 use…

Correct, FreeBSD ;-)

… the top two by average connection time (DataPipe and Aplus.net) both use FreeBSD to run their main websites. In November, DataPipe was named among New Jersey’s fastest growing companies.

In the top 10: FreeBSD: 4, Linux: 4, Windows: 2

Released: pfSense 1.2.1

pfSense project logo

pfSense project logo

The pfSense project have announced the availability of version 1.2.1:

This is a strictly a maintenance release, meaning it contains only bug fixes in the pfSense code, no new features. Though we also upgraded the base OS from FreeBSD 6.2 to 7.0, which necessitated numerous changes in how things are configured. The change to FreeBSD 7.0 brings improved performance and more hardware support.

AnnouncementChangelog | Downloads

If you’re interested in pfSense or if you’re using it in a production environment, you may be interested in the Network Perimeter Redundancy with pfSense presentation that Chris Buechler will be doing at the DCBSDCon 2009.

What do you get when you cross an enterprise-class packet filtering subsystem with a graphical front-end for easy configuration and maintenance?  A throbbing headache for commercial vendors like SonicWALL, that’s what.

More details on the presentation can be found here.

To find the details of other 2009 FreeBSD related events and conferences, check my FreeBSD Events calendar.

FreeBSD foundation newsletter – December 2008

FreeBSD foundation logoPlease find below the FreeBSD Foundation Newsletter for December 2008.

In this Edition:

  • Letter From the Vice President
  • End-of-Year Fundraising Drive
  • Safe Removal of Active Disk Devices
  • Improvements to the FreeBSD TCP Stack
  • Network Stack Virtualization Project
  • FreeBSD Advocacy in Ticino 2008
  • NYCBSDCon 2008
  • EuroBSDCan 2008
  • meetBSD 2008
  • Foundation at meetBSD and Developer Recognition
  • 2008 Grant and Travel Grant Recipients
  • Travel Grant Recipient Spotlight
  • FreeBSD Testimonial from Hobnob, Inc.
  • Financials

Full newsletter below.

Continue reading

The circle of technology and FreeBSD

Ivan Voras writes he read the release notes of FreeBSD 1.1 and it struck him how many developers have joined the Core Team and then moved on, i.e. there’s a lot of fresh blood and no “tsar” heading up the project. Additionally there are also technical and organisational problems that in some way seem to be returning every now and then.

Two things are interesting to me here:

  • The only name in the old core team I recognize is Jordan Hubbard, and he’s not a FreeBSD developer any more (joined Apple for Mac OS X)
  • Some problems, both technical and organizational, are always repeating themselves.
    Full post here

What do you think? Do you agree with this or do you see things differently?